On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 05:18:40PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 17.09.22 um 08:17 schrieb Ville Syrjälä: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 06:05:30PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > >> Am 15.09.22 um 15:02 schrieb Yadav, Arvind: > >>> On 9/15/2022 5:37 PM, Christian König wrote: > >>>> Is that sufficient to allow running a desktop on amdgpu with the > >>>> extra check enabled? If yes that would be quite a milestone. > >>>> > >>> Yes, It is running on amdgpu with extra config enabled. > >> In this case I will start pushing the patches to drm-misc-next. I'm just > >> going to leave out the last one until the IGT tests are working as well. > > ffs Christian. intel CI blew up yet again: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12146/shard-glk7/igt@kms_plane_lowres@tiling-y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > The last time (some ttm thing) was just a week or two ago, > > so it's really getting tiresome watching you push entirely > > untested stuff all the time. Would be really helpful if you > > finally started to do/require premerge testing. > > Well first of all sorry for causing trouble, but as I wrote above I > intentionally left out the last one to *not* break the IGT tests. > > The patches pushed so far where just updating a bunch of corner cases > and fixing the selftests. > > Do you have any more insight why that should affect the IGT tests? I have no idea. You have the oopses from pstore right there. Did you even look at them? -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
