Hi Ming,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 07:47:47AM +0000, Ming Qian wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c
> >> b/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c
> >> index e9aeb3453dfc..019c77e84514 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c
> >> @@ -59,6 +59,36 @@ const struct vpu_format
> >*vpu_helper_find_format(struct vpu_inst *inst, u32 type,
> >> return NULL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +const struct vpu_format *vpu_helper_find_sibling(struct vpu_inst
> >> +*inst, u32 type, u32 pixelfmt) {
> >> + const struct vpu_format *fmt;
> >> + const struct vpu_format *sibling;
> >> +
> >> + fmt = vpu_helper_find_format(inst, type, pixelfmt);
> >> + if (!fmt || !fmt->sibling)
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +
> >> + sibling = vpu_helper_find_format(inst, type, fmt->sibling);
> >> + if (!sibling || sibling->sibling != fmt->pixfmt ||
> >> + sibling->comp_planes != fmt->comp_planes)
> >> + return NULL;
> >
> >I think to preserve code style you need the following solutions on this if
> >statement:
> >
> >if (!sibling || (sibling->sibling != fmt->pixfmt) ||
> > (sibling->comp_planes != fmt->comp_planes))
> > return NULL;
> >
> >I think I have suggested to you this solution on the v4. But never mind we
> >need this :)
> >
> >Thanks
> >
>
> Hi Tommaso,
> The parentheses are unnecessary, the checkpatch.pl will report the following style problems if I add the parentheses:
>
> CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'sibling->sibling != fmt->pixfmt'
> #11: FILE: drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c:72:
> + if (!sibling || (sibling->sibling != fmt->pixfmt) ||
> + (sibling->comp_planes != fmt->comp_planes))
>
> CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'sibling->comp_planes != fmt->comp_planes'
> #11: FILE: drivers/media/platform/amphion/vpu_helpers.c:72:
> + if (!sibling || (sibling->sibling != fmt->pixfmt) ||
> + (sibling->comp_planes != fmt->comp_planes))
>
> total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 2 checks, 10 lines checked
>
> NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
> mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
>
> 1.patch has style problems, please review.
>
> NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
> them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
Sorry, my bad. I don't check this using checkpatch.pl, but checking the
others driver code, you are right. Thanks for clarify this.
Then, Looks good to me.
Regards,
Tommaso
--
Tommaso Merciai
Embedded Linux Engineer
tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.amarulasolutions.com
