Re: [PATCH] mediatek/jpeg: validate data_offsets for v4l2 planes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 3:31 PM Nicolas Dufresne
<nicolas.dufresne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 23 juin 2022 à 15:14 -0400, Justin Green a écrit :
> > Validate V4L2 plane data_offset values. We need to make sure the size of
> > the image we're encoding does not exceed the size of the buffer minus
> > its offset.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Justin Green <greenjustin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > index bc5b0a0168ec..8f5c1b9937bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > @@ -687,6 +687,10 @@ static int mtk_jpeg_buf_prepare(struct vb2_buffer *vb)
> >
> >       for (i = 0; i < q_data->fmt->colplanes; i++) {
> >               plane_fmt = q_data->pix_mp.plane_fmt[i];
> > +                if (vb->planes[i].data_offset > vb2_plane_size(vb, i) ||
> > +                    vb2_plane_size(vb, i) - vb->planes[i].data_offset
> > +                    < plane_fmt.sizeimage)
> > +                    return -EINVAL;
>
> Just double checking, but has data_offset been verified already to prevent the
> underflow ?

I believe the "vb->planes[i].data_offset > vb2_plane_size(vb, i)"
check should do that, right?

>
> >               if (ctx->enable_exif &&
> >                   q_data->fmt->fourcc == V4L2_PIX_FMT_JPEG)
> >                       vb2_set_plane_payload(vb, i, plane_fmt.sizeimage +
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux