Hi Hans, On Friday 23 July 2010 15:46:29 Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Friday 23 July 2010 15:01:29 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > Trying to implement support for multiple sensors connected to the same > > OMAP3 ISP input (all but one of the sensors need to be kept in reset > > obviously), I need to associate host-specific data to the sensor > > subdevs. > > > > The terms host and bridge are considered as synonyms in the rest of this > > e- mail. > > > > The OMAP3 ISP platform data has interface configuration parameters for > > the two CSI2 (a and c), CCP2 and parallel interfaces. The parameters are > > used to configure the bus when a sensor is selected. To support multiple > > sensors on the same input, the parameters need to be specified > > per-sensor, and not ISP- wide. > > > > No issue in the platform data. Board codes declare an array of structures > > that embed a struct v4l2_subdev_i2c_board_info instance and an OMAP3 > > ISP-specific interface configuration structure. > > > > At runtime, when a sensor is selected, I need to access the OMAP3 > > ISP-specific interface configuration structure for the selected sensor. > > At that point all I have is a v4l2_subdev structure pointer, without a > > way to get back to the interface configuration structure. > > > > The only point in the code where the v4l2_subdev and the interface > > configuration data are both known and could be linked together is in the > > host driver's probe function, where the v4l2_subdev instances are > > created. I have two solutions there: > > > > - store the v4l2_subdev pointer and the interface configuration data > > pointer in a host-specific array, and perform a an array lookup > > operation at runtime with the v4l2_subdev pointer as a key > > > > - add a void *host_priv field to the v4l2_subdev structure, store the > > interface configuration data pointer in that field, and use the field at > > runtime > > > > The second solution seems cleaner but requires an additional field in > > v4l2_subdev. Opinions and other comments will be appreciated. > > There is a third option: the grp_id field is owned by the host driver, so > you could make that an index into a host specific array. Good point. > That said, I think having a host_priv field isn't a bad idea. Although if > we do this, then I think the existing priv field should be renamed to > drv_priv to prevent confusion. As Guennadi, Sakari and you all agree that the host_priv field is a good idea, I'll submit a patch. Thanks. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
