On 27.04.22 12:29, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote: > On 27.04.2022 12:34, Oliver Neukum wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I was looking at those two patches and I cannot help myself, >> it looks to me like they are both fixing the same issue in two >> different ways. >> Could you clarify? > Hi! > > As far as I can see > > 8ea0f2ba0fa3f > adds of_node_put(node); > > while 4affafd7bec7c > adds put_device(pm->larbvenclt & pm->larbvenc); > > Which clash do you mean? > Hi, thank you. I think I had a brain short circuit. It is clear to me, why of_put_node() needed to be added in 8ea0f2ba0fa3f. Yet I just cannot see where the get_device() corresponding to the put_device added in 4affafd7bec7c is. So I jumped to conclusions. Sorry Oliver
