Hi Jonathan, On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 05:31:54PM +0200, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:40:12AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:25:43PM +0100, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:18:55AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:10:06PM +0100, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote: > > > > > As discussed with other developers, the linux-uvc-devel mailing list is > > > > > not very useful anymore, and it's better to send people to the general > > > > > linux-media mailing list. > > > > > > > > > > Replace/remove the old mailing list address in uvcvideo.rst and > > > > > MAINTAINERS. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > v2: > > > > > - Changed mailing list to linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx instead > > > > > > > > > > v1: > > > > > - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220312203323.626657-1-j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx/ > > > > > --- > > > > > Documentation/userspace-api/media/drivers/uvcvideo.rst | 2 +- > > > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 - > > > > > > > > This looks good, but I think we should also add the following: > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c > > > > index 5f394d4efc21..6c6a82af07ce 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c > > > > @@ -2443,7 +2443,7 @@ static int uvc_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, > > > > "Forcing device quirks to 0x%x by module parameter for testing purpose.\n", > > > > dev->quirks); > > > > dev_info(&dev->udev->dev, > > > > - "Please report required quirks to the linux-uvc-devel mailing list.\n"); > > > > + "Please report required quirks to the linux-media mailing list.\n"); > > > > } > > > > > > > > if (dev->info->uvc_version) { > > > > > > > > If you're fine with that change, there's no need to resubmit, I can > > > > handle this locally. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Ah, just before I saw your reply, I noticed this instance too, and sent > > > a separate patch for it. > > > > I'd say great minds think alike if it wasn't presumptuous :-) > > > > > I'll leave it up to you to handle it as you wish, I'm fine with it > > > either way. > > > > I'll squash the two patches as they're closely related. > > Ping — I don't see this patch in linux-next. Is there something I can do > to help? I've just sent a pull request, the patch should make it to v5.19. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
