Re: [PATCH v2 02/23] media: v4l2-mem2mem: Trace on implicit un-hold

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 03:37:04PM -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> If the timestamp of the src buffer differs from the timestamp of a held
> dst buffer, the held buffer is implicitly removed and marked as done.
> Add a trace to help debugging if someone hits that case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> index 675e22895ebe..fbcd79763e8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> @@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ static void __v4l2_m2m_try_queue(struct v4l2_m2m_dev *m2m_dev,
>  	if (src && dst && dst->is_held &&
>  	    dst->vb2_buf.copied_timestamp &&
>  	    dst->vb2_buf.timestamp != src->vb2_buf.timestamp) {
> +		dprintk("src and dst timestamp mismatch, removing held capture buffer.\n");

Nitpick: I would try to make this log consistent with the other logs,
avoid refering to "src" and "dst" and start with a capital letter.

How about "Timestamp mismatch, returning held capture buffer".

Either way, thanks for improving this.

Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  		dst->is_held = false;
>  		v4l2_m2m_dst_buf_remove(m2m_ctx);
>  		v4l2_m2m_buf_done(dst, VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux