Le mardi 29 mars 2022 à 15:57 +0200, Sebastian Fricke a écrit :
> Hey Nicolas,
>
> On 28.03.2022 15:59, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> > On -> One
>
> Hmmmm the message "One job queue already" doesn't sound correct. I think
> the message wants to say that the buffer is already on the queue.
>
> We could maybe enhance the message like:
> "Buffer already found on the job queue\n"
I think I read queue -> queued. The new message would be inaccurate with this
suggestion. I'll just drop that patch in V2, the fact that this message was
miss-leading to me is irrelevant to the patchset.
>
> But this is not a typo from my POV.
>
> Greetings,
> Sebastian
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> > index 675e22895ebe..53c2332d5cbd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c
> > @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static void __v4l2_m2m_try_queue(struct v4l2_m2m_dev *m2m_dev,
> > }
> >
> > if (m2m_ctx->job_flags & TRANS_QUEUED) {
> > - dprintk("On job queue already\n");
> > + dprintk("One job queue already\n");
> > goto job_unlock;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
