Em Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:34:47 +0100 Hugues FRUCHET - FOSS <hugues.fruchet@xxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > Ideally we would like to stick to sti/ and stm32/ at same level, as it > is done in various other locations: > > ./Documentation/arm/sti/ > ./Documentation/arm/stm32/ > > ./arch/arm/mach-sti > ./arch/arm/mach-stm32 > > ./drivers/media/cec/platform/sti/ > ./drivers/media/cec/platform/stm32/ > > ./drivers/gpu/drm/sti/ > ./drivers/gpu/drm/stm/ > > ./sound/soc/sti/ > ./sound/soc/stm/ > > Is this possible to keep those media folders as is ? If we add them under: ./drivers/media/platform/stm/sti/ ./drivers/media/platform/stm/stm32/ They'll both be at the same level. It has been increasingly hard to maintain media/platform, as the file become too big and disorganized. Sorting it per-vendor seems to be the best thing, as it will keep things better organized. As a side effect, with such kind of change, it is now possible to have a MAINTAINERS entry that would point to a mailing list and/or some SoC maintainers/reviewers that should be c/c to all patches affecting drivers/media/platform/<vendor>. Thanks, Mauro
