On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 09:01 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 07/05/2010 07:11 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > > Assuming the new kthread_worker implementation is OK, this change for > > ivtv looks good. > > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Walls <awalls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Andy Walls <awalls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > May I route this patch through wq branch? As it's not clear how this > whole patchset will end up, I think it would be better to keep things > isolated in this branch. Yes, I think that is the best way to do things. Regards, Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
