On 09/02/2022 09:38, Qing Wang wrote: > From: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx> > > do_div() does a 64-by-32 division. > When the divisor is u64, do_div() truncates it to 32 bits, this means it > can test non-zero and be truncated to zero for division. > > fix do_div.cocci warning: > do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c | 2 +- > drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda18271c2dd.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c > index d1d206e..1ce2e67 > --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c > @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz, > z = 7 * sample_freq_hz; > do_div(t, z); > t += 5; > - do_div(t, 10); > + div64_u64(t, 10); This makes no sense, I think you intended to convert the previous do_div(t, z). > > tda10048_writereg(state, TDA10048_TIME_WREF_LSB, (u8)t); > tda10048_writereg(state, TDA10048_TIME_WREF_MID1, (u8)(t >> 8)); > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda18271c2dd.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda18271c2dd.c > index a3483448..fd92878 > --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda18271c2dd.c > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda18271c2dd.c > @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static int CalcMainPLL(struct tda_state *state, u32 freq) > > OscFreq = (u64) freq * (u64) Div; > OscFreq *= (u64) 16384; > - do_div(OscFreq, (u64)16000000); > + do_div(OscFreq, 16000000); > MainDiv = OscFreq; > > state->m_Regs[MPD] = PostDiv & 0x77; > @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int CalcCalPLL(struct tda_state *state, u32 freq) > OscFreq = (u64)freq * (u64)Div; > /* CalDiv = u32( OscFreq * 16384 / 16000000 ); */ > OscFreq *= (u64)16384; > - do_div(OscFreq, (u64)16000000); > + do_div(OscFreq, 16000000); > CalDiv = OscFreq; > > state->m_Regs[CPD] = PostDiv; The changes here do not match with the subject line of this patch. I think it is best to split this into two patches, one for each source. Regards, Hans
