On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 02:43:39PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > Drivers should not add containers as shared fences to the dma_resv > object, instead each fence should be added individually. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c > index 6dd9a40b55d4..e8a0c1d51da2 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c > @@ -256,6 +256,11 @@ void dma_resv_add_shared_fence(struct dma_resv *obj, struct dma_fence *fence) > > dma_resv_assert_held(obj); > > + /* Drivers should not add containers here, instead add each fence > + * individually. > + */ > + WARN_ON(dma_fence_is_container(fence)); I'm honestly not sure whether this could go boom, so good if we push this asap and let it soak in linux-next for the entire release cycle. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> On the change itself, we'll see what it brings. -Daniel > + > fobj = dma_resv_shared_list(obj); > count = fobj->shared_count; > > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
