Re: Correct way to do s_ctrl ioctl taking into account subdev framework?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There really is no good way at the moment to handle cases like this, or at
> least not without a lot of work.

Ok, it's good to know I'm not missing something obvious.

> The plan is to have the framework merged in time for 2.6.36. My last patch
> series for the framework already converts a bunch of subdevs to use it. Your
> best bet is to take the patch series and convert any remaining subdevs used
> by em28xx and em28xx itself. I'd be happy to add those patches to my patch
> series, so that when I get the go ahead the em28xx driver will be fixed
> automatically.
>
> It would be useful for me anyway to have someone else use it: it's a good
> check whether my documentation is complete.

Sure, could you please point me to the tree in question and I'll take a look?

Given I've got applications failing, for the short term I will likely
just submit a patch which makes the s_ctrl always return zero
regardless of the subdev response, instead of returning 1.

Thanks,

Devin

-- 
Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux