On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There really is no good way at the moment to handle cases like this, or at > least not without a lot of work. Ok, it's good to know I'm not missing something obvious. > The plan is to have the framework merged in time for 2.6.36. My last patch > series for the framework already converts a bunch of subdevs to use it. Your > best bet is to take the patch series and convert any remaining subdevs used > by em28xx and em28xx itself. I'd be happy to add those patches to my patch > series, so that when I get the go ahead the em28xx driver will be fixed > automatically. > > It would be useful for me anyway to have someone else use it: it's a good > check whether my documentation is complete. Sure, could you please point me to the tree in question and I'll take a look? Given I've got applications failing, for the short term I will likely just submit a patch which makes the s_ctrl always return zero regardless of the subdev response, instead of returning 1. Thanks, Devin -- Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs http://www.kernellabs.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
