Hi Johan, Thank you for the patch. On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:20 PM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Drivers should generally not print anything for a successful probe, and > printing "success" before probe is done makes no sense. > > Drop the unnecessary and misleading dev_info() call from probe. > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Prabhakar > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c > index 4a260f4ed236..03b4e51bb13a 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif.c > @@ -456,8 +456,6 @@ static int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev); > pm_runtime_get(&pdev->dev); > > - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "vpif probe success\n"); > - > /* > * If VPIF Node has endpoints, assume "new" DT support, > * where capture and display drivers don't have DT nodes > -- > 2.32.0 >
