Hi Jacopo,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 06:47:42PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Add the set_routing() subdev operation to allow userspace to configure
> routing on the max9286 deserializer.
>
> Implement route verification but do not take routing into consideration
> when configuring the CSI-2 output and pixel rate yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> index 1b9ff537d08e..eb76acdb2cd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/max9286.c
> @@ -832,6 +832,91 @@ static int max9286_get_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int max9286_routing_validate(struct max9286_priv *priv,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_krouting *routing)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_routing_validate_1_to_1(routing);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Make sure all routes points to the single source pad which can have
> + * up to 4 streams. All routes shall start from a sink pad and shall not
> + * have more than one sink stream. The GMSL link for the sink has to be
> + * enabled.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < routing->num_routes; ++i) {
> + const struct v4l2_subdev_route *route = &routing->routes[i];
> + struct max9286_source *source = &priv->sources[i];
> +
> + if (route->source_pad != MAX9286_SRC_PAD ||
> + route->source_stream > 4) {
> + dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> + "Invalid (%u,%u) source in route %u\n",
> + route->source_pad, route->source_stream, i);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (route->sink_pad >= MAX9286_N_SINKS ||
> + route->sink_stream != 0) {
> + dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> + "Invalid (%u,%u) sink in route %u\n",
> + route->sink_pad, route->sink_stream, i);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + source = &priv->sources[route->sink_pad];
> + if (!source->fwnode) {
> + dev_err(&priv->client->dev,
> + "Cannot set route for non-active source %u\n",
> + route->sink_pad);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
Apart from from possibly using the new helper I've submitted, this looks
fine.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int _max9286_set_routing(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_krouting *routing)
> +{
> + struct max9286_priv *priv = sd_to_max9286(sd);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = max9286_routing_validate(priv, routing);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Re-initialize the format on a routing change. */
> + ret = v4l2_subdev_set_routing_with_fmt(sd, state, routing,
> + &max9286_default_format);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int max9286_set_routing(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_state *state,
> + enum v4l2_subdev_format_whence which,
> + struct v4l2_subdev_krouting *routing)
> +{
> + struct max9286_priv *priv = sd_to_max9286(sd);
> + unsigned int i;
> + int ret;
> +
> + v4l2_subdev_lock_state(state);
> +
I'd drop the blank line, or add one before the unlock call.
> + ret = _max9286_set_routing(sd, state, routing);
> + v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int max9286_init_cfg(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> struct v4l2_subdev_state *state)
> {
> @@ -858,8 +943,7 @@ static int max9286_init_cfg(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> routing.routes = routes;
>
> v4l2_subdev_lock_state(state);
> - ret = v4l2_subdev_set_routing_with_fmt(sd, state, &routing,
> - &max9286_default_format);
> + ret = _max9286_set_routing(sd, state, &routing);
> v4l2_subdev_unlock_state(state);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -874,6 +958,7 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_pad_ops max9286_pad_ops = {
> .enum_mbus_code = max9286_enum_mbus_code,
> .get_fmt = max9286_get_fmt,
> .set_fmt = max9286_set_fmt,
> + .set_routing = max9286_set_routing,
> };
>
> static const struct v4l2_subdev_ops max9286_subdev_ops = {
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
