On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:38:55AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 05:24:16PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:43:52AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
> > > field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid
> > > intentionally writing across neighboring fields. Wrap the target region
> > > in struct_group(). This additionally fixes a theoretical misalignment
> > > of the copy (since the size of "buf" changes between 64-bit and 32-bit,
> > > but this is likely never built for 64-bit).
> > >
> > > FWIW, I think this code is totally broken on 64-bit (which appears to
> > > not be a "real" build configuration): it would either always fail (with
> > > an uninitialized data->buf_size) or would cause corruption in userspace
> > > due to the copy_to_user() in the call path against an uninitialized
> > > data->buf value:
> > >
> > > omap3isp_stat_request_statistics_time32(...)
> > > struct omap3isp_stat_data data64;
> > > ...
> > > omap3isp_stat_request_statistics(stat, &data64);
> > >
> > > int omap3isp_stat_request_statistics(struct ispstat *stat,
> > > struct omap3isp_stat_data *data)
> > > ...
> > > buf = isp_stat_buf_get(stat, data);
> > >
> > > static struct ispstat_buffer *isp_stat_buf_get(struct ispstat *stat,
> > > struct omap3isp_stat_data *data)
> > > ...
> > > if (buf->buf_size > data->buf_size) {
> > > ...
> > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > }
> > > ...
> > > rval = copy_to_user(data->buf,
> > > buf->virt_addr,
> > > buf->buf_size);
> > >
> > > Regardless, additionally initialize data64 to be zero-filled to avoid
> > > undefined behavior.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 378e3f81cb56 ("media: omap3isp: support 64-bit version of omap3isp_stat_data")
> > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c | 5 +++--
> > > include/uapi/linux/omap3isp.h | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c
> > > index 5b9b57f4d9bf..68cf68dbcace 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c
> > > @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ int omap3isp_stat_request_statistics(struct ispstat *stat,
> > > int omap3isp_stat_request_statistics_time32(struct ispstat *stat,
> > > struct omap3isp_stat_data_time32 *data)
> > > {
> > > - struct omap3isp_stat_data data64;
> > > + struct omap3isp_stat_data data64 = { };
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > ret = omap3isp_stat_request_statistics(stat, &data64);
> > > @@ -521,7 +521,8 @@ int omap3isp_stat_request_statistics_time32(struct ispstat *stat,
> > >
> > > data->ts.tv_sec = data64.ts.tv_sec;
> > > data->ts.tv_usec = data64.ts.tv_usec;
> > > - memcpy(&data->buf, &data64.buf, sizeof(*data) - sizeof(data->ts));
> > > + data->buf = (uintptr_t)data64.buf;
> >
> > Shouldn't this be
> >
> > data->buf = (uintptr_t)(void *)data64.buf;
> >
> > instead?
>
> This is already a void *:
>
> struct omap3isp_stat_data {
> ...
> void __user *buf;
> };
>
> But I agree, the mix of structures in here is confusing! :)
Yep; you're right. :)
Thanks
--
Gustavo
