On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > This is just abusing internals of the dma_resv object. > > Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> Yeah I think if we want this back we could do a _locked version of the wait, which prunes internally. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> Btw I wonder, should we put the ttm_bo_wait wrapper on the chopping block in gpu/todo.rst? It's really just complications I think in most cases. And it would be nice if ttm has the same errno semantics for these as everyone else, I always get very confused about this stuff ... Cheers, Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > index e4a20a3a5d16..fc124457ba2f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > @@ -1086,7 +1086,6 @@ int ttm_bo_wait(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, > if (timeout == 0) > return -EBUSY; > > - dma_resv_add_excl_fence(bo->base.resv, NULL); > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_wait); > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
