On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:19:13 +0000 Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We know that the buffer's alignment will always be a power of two; > therefore, we can use the faster round_down() macro. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> *groan*. I don't want to know where the naming of these two came from but that is spectacular... Anyhow, happy to pick up 1-3 now if you like as all are good cleanup of existing code. Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c > index 1ac94c4e9792..f8ce26a24c57 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int iio_dmaengine_buffer_submit_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue, > dma_cookie_t cookie; > > block->bytes_used = min(block->size, dmaengine_buffer->max_size); > - block->bytes_used = rounddown(block->bytes_used, > + block->bytes_used = round_down(block->bytes_used, > dmaengine_buffer->align); > > desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(dmaengine_buffer->chan,
