On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Quoting Johan Hovold (2021-10-26 10:55:11)
> > Add the missing bulk-endpoint max-packet sanity check to probe() to
> > avoid division by zero in uvc_alloc_urb_buffers() in case a malicious
> > device has broken descriptors (or when doing descriptor fuzz testing).
> >
> > Note that USB core will reject URBs submitted for endpoints with zero
> > wMaxPacketSize but that drivers doing packet-size calculations still
> > need to handle this (cf. commit 2548288b4fb0 ("USB: Fix: Don't skip
> > endpoint descriptors with maxpacket=0")).
> >
> > Fixes: c0efd232929c ("V4L/DVB (8145a): USB Video Class driver")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 2.6.26
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> > index e16464606b14..85ac5c1081b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
> > @@ -1958,6 +1958,10 @@ static int uvc_video_start_transfer(struct uvc_streaming *stream,
> > if (ep == NULL)
> > return -EIO;
> >
> > + /* Reject broken descriptors. */
> > + if (usb_endpoint_maxp(&ep->desc) == 0)
> > + return -EIO;
>
> Is there any value in identifying this with a specific return code like
> -ENODATA?
Going one step further, wouldn't it be better to fail probe() for those
devices ?
> But either way, this seems sane.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > +
> > ret = uvc_init_video_bulk(stream, ep, gfp_flags);
> > }
> >
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
