Hi Mauro, On Friday 21 May 2010 16:05:29 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hans Verkuil wrote: > > I had hoped to get hardware to test it with, but no such luck (yet). But > > there seems to be no sense in holding these patches back on the > > off-chance that I can get hardware. > > > > Gerard, you mentioned earlier that you actually had a c-qcam. It would be > > nice if you can test this. > > Pulled, thanks. > > I'm now trying a new way of merging patches: I'm creating some topic > branches, as /staging/<foo>. This is the first merge of the new procedure > ;) > > So, basically, those patches went to /staging/v4l1. > > I'll periodically merge the staging patches at devel/for_v42.6.35 branches, > for patches that I'll send for the current merge window, and at > devel/for_v2.6.36, for the patches to the next merge window. When will they be merged to master ? > This new procedure is still experimental, but I think it will be better > than the previous one. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
