While there's nothing wrong with EN DASH on C code, this probably
came from some cut-and paste from an ITU-T table.
It sounds better to just an HYPHEN here.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/nal-h264.c | 2 +-
drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/nal-hevc.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/nal-h264.c b/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/nal-h264.c
index 94dd9266d850..a02095eb3fcf 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/nal-h264.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/nal-h264.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
#include "nal-rbsp.h"
/*
- * See Rec. ITU-T H.264 (04/2017) Table 7-1 – NAL unit type codes, syntax
+ * See Rec. ITU-T H.264 (04/2017) Table 7-1 -- NAL unit type codes, syntax
* element categories, and NAL unit type classes
*/
enum nal_unit_type {
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/nal-hevc.c b/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/nal-hevc.c
index 5db540c69bfe..15a352e45831 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/nal-hevc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/allegro-dvt/nal-hevc.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
#include "nal-rbsp.h"
/*
- * See Rec. ITU-T H.265 (02/2018) Table 7-1 – NAL unit type codes and NAL unit
+ * See Rec. ITU-T H.265 (02/2018) Table 7-1 - NAL unit type codes and NAL unit
* type classes
*/
enum nal_unit_type {
--
2.31.1
