Hi, Am Sonntag, den 16.05.2010, 06:21 +0200 schrieb Oliver Endriss: > On Sunday 16 May 2010 03:53:48 hermann pitton wrote: > > > > Am Samstag, den 15.05.2010, 22:33 -0300 schrieb Douglas Schilling > > Landgraf: > > > Hello Oliver, > > > > > > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Oliver Endriss <o.endriss@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 21 April 2010 11:44:16 Oliver Endriss wrote: > > > >> On Wednesday 21 April 2010 08:37:39 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > >> > > Am 22.3.2010 20:34, schrieb e9hack: > > > >> > >> Am 20.3.2010 22:37, schrieb Hans Verkuil: > > > >> > >>> On Saturday 20 March 2010 17:03:01 e9hack wrote: > > > >> > >>> OK, I know that. But does the patch I mailed you last time fix this > > > >> > >>> problem > > > >> > >>> without causing new ones? If so, then I'll post that patch to the list. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> With your last patch, I've no problems. I'm using a a TT-C2300 and a > > > >> > >> Budget card. If my > > > >> > >> VDR does start, currently I've no chance to determine which module is > > > >> > >> load first, but it > > > >> > >> works. If I unload all modules and load it again, I've no problem. In > > > >> > >> this case, the > > > >> > >> modules for the budget card is load first and the modules for the FF > > > >> > >> loads as second one. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Ping!!!!!! > > > >> > > > > >> > It's merged in Mauro's fixes tree, but I don't think those pending patches > > > >> > have been pushed upstream yet. Mauro, can you verify this? They should be > > > >> > pushed to 2.6.34! > > > >> > > > >> What about the HG driver? > > > >> The v4l-dvb HG repository is broken for 7 weeks... > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > we have May 16th, and the HG driver is broken for 10 weeks now! > > > > > > > > History: > > > > - The changeset which caused the mess was applied on March 2nd: > > > > http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/2eda2bcc8d6f > > > > > > > > - A fix is waiting at fixes.git since March 24th: > > > > http://git.linuxtv.org/fixes.git?a=commitdiff_plain;h=40358c8b5380604ac2507be2fac0c9bbd3e02b73 > > > > > > > > Are there any plans to bring v4ldvb HG to an usable state? > > > > > > Yes, Now I will collect patches from devel and fixes tree. At least > > > until we achieve a better approach on it. > > > Sorry the delay. > > > > > > Sounds good? Any other suggestion? > > > > > > Let me work on it. > > > > > > Cheers > > > Douglas > > > > > > Hi, Douglas and Oliver, > > > > just as a small comment. > > > > I have not been on latest rc1 and such rcs close to a release for some > > time. > > > > But I was for a long time and v4l-dvb can't be a substitute for such. > > Sorry, I do not want to cope with experimental kernels and their bugs on > my systems. I need a stable and reliable platform, so that I can > concentrate on 'my' bugs. > > Usually I update the kernel every 3..4 releases (which causes enough > trouble due to changed features, interfaces etc). that is what everyone does prefer and that I call subsystem developer service. In fact, everyone has to be on .rc stuff starting with .rc1 ;) Failing on being there, than blaming the one doing the backports for being in delay, likely without any related hardware in his possession, that can't work. Cheers, Hermann -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html