On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 03:44:48PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Wed, 28 Apr 2021 23:37:54 +0530
> Deepak R Varma <drv@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> > Replace hard coded function names from the debug print strings by
> > standard __func__ predefined identifier. This resolves following
> > checkpatch script WARNING:
> > Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using function's name, in a string.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v3:
> > - None.
> > Changes since v2:
> > - None.
> > Changes since v1:
> > - None.
>
> Huh? Why are you sending a new version when there's no difference
> from the past ones?
Sorry, I thought I have to resend the whole patch set so that all the
patches have the same version history. Are you saying I just resend the
ones that required a change? No need to include those that do not have any
comments / feedback or are acked?
>
> >
> > .../staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c | 2 +-
> > .../staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c | 2 +-
> > .../staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c | 2 +-
> > .../staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> > .../staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c | 2 +-
> > 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> > index d68a2bcc9ae1..b572551f1a0d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc0310.c
> > @@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ static int gc0310_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > struct gc0310_device *dev = to_gc0310_sensor(sd);
> >
> > - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "gc0310_remove...\n");
> > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s...\n", __func__);
> >
>
> As Dan already pointed, please delete this and other
> dev_dbg() that are just tracing functions without any other
> real meaning. If one needs that, ftrace could be used.
I have made this correction in a separate patch send afterwards. I will
confirm if this file was included. If not, I will include this in the next
version.
>
>
>
> > dev->platform_data->csi_cfg(sd, 0);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> > index e722c639b60d..548c572d3b57 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-gc2235.c
> > @@ -1034,7 +1034,7 @@ static int gc2235_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > struct gc2235_device *dev = to_gc2235_sensor(sd);
> >
> > - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "gc2235_remove...\n");
> > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s...\n", __func__);
> >
> > dev->platform_data->csi_cfg(sd, 0);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c
> > index 7ca7378b1859..ab10fd98dbc0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-lm3554.c
> > @@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ static int lm3554_detect(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> > int ret;
> >
> > if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA)) {
> > - dev_err(&client->dev, "lm3554_detect i2c error\n");
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s i2c error\n", __func__);
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> > index f167781e258a..a51ad9843d39 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2680.c
> > @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int ov2680_g_bin_factor_x(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, s32 *val)
> > struct ov2680_device *dev = to_ov2680_sensor(sd);
> > struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
> >
> > - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_g_bin_factor_x\n");
> > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++%s\n", __func__);
> > *val = ov2680_res[dev->fmt_idx].bin_factor_x;
> >
> > return 0;
> > @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static int ov2680_g_bin_factor_y(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, s32 *val)
> > struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd);
> >
> > *val = ov2680_res[dev->fmt_idx].bin_factor_y;
> > - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_g_bin_factor_y\n");
> > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++%s\n", __func__);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int ov2680_get_intg_factor(struct i2c_client *client,
> > u16 reg_val;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++ov2680_get_intg_factor\n");
> > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "++++%s\n", __func__);
> > if (!info)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > @@ -251,8 +251,8 @@ static long __ov2680_set_exposure(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int coarse_itg,
> > int ret, exp_val;
> >
> > dev_dbg(&client->dev,
> > - "+++++++__ov2680_set_exposure coarse_itg %d, gain %d, digitgain %d++\n",
> > - coarse_itg, gain, digitgain);
> > + "+++++++%s coarse_itg %d, gain %d, digitgain %d++\n",
> > + __func__, coarse_itg, gain, digitgain);
>
> This one for instance, is not a plain trace, so it could make
> sense to be kept, but please remove those "+++..." sequences
> from the string, as this has no meaning. So, just:
>
> dev_dbg(&client->dev,
> "%s: coarse_itg %d, gain %d, digitgain %d\n",
> __func__, coarse_itg, gain, digitgain);
>
> would be enough.
Sounds good. I will include this in my next version.
>
> >
> > vts = ov2680_res[dev->fmt_idx].lines_per_frame;
> >
> > @@ -1060,9 +1060,9 @@ static int ov2680_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int enable)
> >
> > mutex_lock(&dev->input_lock);
> > if (enable)
> > - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2680_s_stream one\n");
> > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s one\n", __func__);
>
> There's a typo here:
>
> one -> on
>
> Please fix.
Yes, will do.
>
> > else
> > - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2680_s_stream off\n");
> > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s off\n", __func__);
>
> Btw, the entire logic above could be re-written as:
>
> dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s: %s\n", __func__,
> enable ? "on" : "off");
>
> >
> > ret = ov2680_write_reg(client, 1, OV2680_SW_STREAM,
> > enable ? OV2680_START_STREAMING :
> > @@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ static int ov2680_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > struct ov2680_device *dev = to_ov2680_sensor(sd);
> >
> > - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2680_remove...\n");
> > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s...\n", __func__);
> >
> > dev->platform_data->csi_cfg(sd, 0);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c
> > index d046a9804f63..69409f8447b5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c
> > @@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ static int ov2722_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > struct ov2722_device *dev = to_ov2722_sensor(sd);
> >
> > - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2722_remove...\n");
> > + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s...\n", __func__);
> >
> > dev->platform_data->csi_cfg(sd, 0);
> > v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&dev->ctrl_handler);
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
Thank you so much for the detailed review. Really appreciate your time
Mauro.
deepak.
