Hi Christophe,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 9:17 PM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 'ret' is known to be 0 here and printing -ENODEV wouldn't be really
> helpful. So remove it from the error message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V2: Remove the Fixes tag. It doesn't really fix something, it just removes
> a useless information.
> Just remove ret. No need to add something else.
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Prabhakar
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c
> index 42f64175a6df..6bbbb94fdda4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c
> @@ -1368,8 +1368,7 @@ static int ov2659_detect(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> id = OV265X_ID(pid, ver);
> if (id != OV2659_ID) {
> dev_err(&client->dev,
> - "Sensor detection failed (%04X, %d)\n",
> - id, ret);
> + "Sensor detection failed (%04X)\n", id);
> ret = -ENODEV;
> } else {
> dev_info(&client->dev, "Found OV%04X sensor\n", id);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
