Hi Sakari,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:58:11PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 03:30:55PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 20/04/2021 14:50, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 10:23:35PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:04:41PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > > > From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add the media bus type to the frame descriptor. CSI-2 specific
> > > > > information will be added in next patch to the frame descriptor.
> > > >
> > > > I'd squash the next patch with this one.
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > - Make the bus type a named enum
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > include/media/v4l2-subdev.h | 9 +++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
> > > > > index d0e9a5bdb08b..85977abbea46 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
> > > > > @@ -340,12 +340,21 @@ struct v4l2_mbus_frame_desc_entry {
> > > > > #define V4L2_FRAME_DESC_ENTRY_MAX 4
> > > > > +enum v4l2_mbus_frame_desc_type {
> > > > > + V4L2_MBUS_FRAME_DESC_TYPE_PLATFORM,
> > > > > + V4L2_MBUS_FRAME_DESC_TYPE_PARALLEL,
> > > > > + V4L2_MBUS_FRAME_DESC_TYPE_CCP2,
> > > > > + V4L2_MBUS_FRAME_DESC_TYPE_CSI2,
> > > > > +};
> > > >
> > > > This should be documented. In particular, I have no idea what
> > > > V4L2_MBUS_FRAME_DESC_TYPE_PLATFORM is. I also wonder if we shouldn't
> > > > drop CCP2 (at least for now), does anyone use that anymore ?
> > >
> > > I guess we don't need one here, not now at least.
> > >
> > > I agree on the documentation.
> >
> > As it's the first one in the list, I think it really means "undefined", so
> > that current users have a value there (I presume they initialize the struct
> > to 0). Sakari?
>
> I guess you could drop PLATFORM if there's no need for it now. In practice
> PARALLEL is probably a good choice.
Works for me too.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
