Hi Tomi, On 2021-04-16 11:47:46 +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi Niklas, > > On 16/04/2021 11:38, Niklas Söderlund wrote: > > Hi Tomi, > > > > I'm very happy to see this being worked on again! > > > > Is there code somewhere that demonstrates the v5 API in use? I still > > have old branches of this series and it would be nice to see how the API > > have evolved for drivers. > > > > Likewise are there some user-space code around that can be used to test > > the API? For v2 and v3 I had some hack patches [1], do they still work? > > More likely they have gone stale by now :-) > > > > 1. git://git.ragnatech.se/v4l-utils routing > > Yes for both. I didn't share those as they're not in a presentable state =). > > But, with the disclaimer that your eyes may bleed when reading the code: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tomba/linux.git > multistream/work > > git://github.com/tomba/kmsxx.git multistream > > On the kernel side, the CAL driver is in relatively good shape. UB960 driver > is somewhat messy but not totally horrible. OV10635 is horrible, as it's > used to fake metadata stream even if the sensor doesn't really have such a > thing. > > For testing I have used kms++ with python bindings. My test script is > py/tests/cam.py > > The uAPI has changed as there's now the 'which' field. But I think that's > the only clear change, although the behavior could be slightly different > wrt. setting formats. Thanks! > > Tomi -- Regards, Niklas Söderlund
