On 02/04/21 01:53PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:01:22PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 10:52:01AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:03:44PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > > > > TI's J721E uses the Cadence CSI2RX and DPHY peripherals to facilitate > > > > capture over a CSI-2 bus. The TI CSI2RX platform driver glues all the > > > > parts together. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@xxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/media/ti,csi2rx.yaml | 70 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,csi2rx.yaml > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,csi2rx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,csi2rx.yaml > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 000000000000..ebd894364391 > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ti,csi2rx.yaml > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > > +--- > > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/ti,csi2rx.yaml# > > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > > + > > > > +title: TI CSI2RX Wrapper Device Tree Bindings > > > > + > > > > A description would be useful, especially given that the TRM doesn't > > mention "CSI2RX". > > > > > > +maintainers: > > > > + - Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@xxxxxx> > > > > + > > > > +properties: > > > > + compatible: > > > > + items: > > > > + - const: ti,csi2rx > > > > + > > > > + dmas: > > > > + description: RX DMA Channel 0 > > > > > > items: > > > - description: RX DMA Channel 0 > > > > > > Or just 'maxItems: 1' > > > > > > > + > > > > + dma-names: > > > > + items: > > > > + - const: rx0 > > > > + > > > > + reg: > > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > > + description: Base address and size of the TI wrapper registers. > > > > > > That's all 'reg' properties, drop 'description'. > > > > According to SPRUIL1B, there are four register banks for the CSI_RX_IF, > > and two register banks for the DPHY_RX. What's your plan to support > > these ? Not everything need to be implemented at once, but backward > > compatibility need to be taken into account in the design. > > > > > > + > > > > + power-domains: > > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > > + description: > > > > + PM domain provider node and an args specifier containing > > > > + the device id value. > > > > > > Drop. > > > > > > > + > > > > + ranges: true > > > > + > > > > + "#address-cells": > > > > + const: 2 > > > > + > > > > + "#size-cells": > > > > + const: 2 > > > > + > > > > +patternProperties: > > > > + "csi-bridge@": > > > > > > "^csi-bridge@" > > > > > > > + type: object > > > > + description: CSI2 bridge node. > > > > > > Just an empty node? > > > > Even if the node is optional, it would be useful to include it in the > > example below, to show how it's supposed to be used. > > > > > > + > > > > +required: > > > > + - compatible > > > > + - reg > > > > + - dmas > > > > + - dma-names > > > > + - power-domains > > > > + - "#address-cells" > > > > + - "#size-cells" > > > > + > > > > +additionalProperties: false > > > > + > > > > +examples: > > > > + - | > > > > + #include <dt-bindings/soc/ti,sci_pm_domain.h> > > > > + > > > > + ti_csi2rx0: ticsi2rx { > > > > + compatible = "ti,csi2rx"; > > > > + dmas = <&main_udmap 0x4940>; > > > > + dma-names = "rx0"; > > > > + reg = <0x0 0x4500000 0x0 0x1000>; > > > > + power-domains = <&k3_pds 26 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>; > > > > + #address-cells = <2>; > > > > + #size-cells = <2>; > > > > + }; > > It would also be useful to expand this to a full example that includes > integration with the PHY. Integration with PHY is Cadence CSI2RX schema's problem. But I will add the subnode here anyway so it should have the PHY related properties as well. -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav Texas Instruments Inc.
