On 25/03/2021 15:02, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> Hi Hans
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 2:57 PM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 25/03/2021 14:54, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
>>> hi Hans
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 1:18 PM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 23/03/2021 16:25, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>>>>> Hi Hans
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the patch. I like how uvc is ending :)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:09 PM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - If __uvc_query_ctrl() failed with a non-EPIPE error, then
>>>>>> report that with dev_err. If an error code is obtained, then
>>>>>> report that with dev_dbg.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - For error 2 (Wrong state) return -EACCES instead of -EILSEQ.
>>>>>> EACCES is a much more appropriate error code. EILSEQ will return
>>>>>> "Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide character." in strerror(),
>>>>>> which is a *very* confusing message.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Ricardo, this too can be added to the uvc series.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
>>>>>> index b63c073ec30e..3f461bb4eeb9 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
>>>>>> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int uvc_query_ctrl(struct uvc_device *dev, u8 query, u8 unit,
>>>>>> u8 intfnum, u8 cs, void *data, u16 size)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>> - u8 error;
>>>>>> + u8 error = 0;
>>>>>> u8 tmp;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ret = __uvc_query_ctrl(dev, query, unit, intfnum, cs, data, size,
>>>>>> @@ -76,35 +76,39 @@ int uvc_query_ctrl(struct uvc_device *dev, u8 query, u8 unit,
>>>>>> if (likely(ret == size))
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - dev_dbg(&dev->udev->dev,
>>>>>> - "Failed to query (%s) UVC control %u on unit %u: %d (exp. %u).\n",
>>>>>> - uvc_query_name(query), cs, unit, ret, size);
>>>>>> + ret = ret < 0 ? ret : -EPIPE;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - if (ret != -EPIPE)
>>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - tmp = *(u8 *)data;
>>>>>> + if (ret == -EPIPE) {
>>>>>> + tmp = *(u8 *)data;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - ret = __uvc_query_ctrl(dev, UVC_GET_CUR, 0, intfnum,
>>>>>> - UVC_VC_REQUEST_ERROR_CODE_CONTROL, data, 1,
>>>>>> - UVC_CTRL_CONTROL_TIMEOUT);
>>>>>> + ret = __uvc_query_ctrl(dev, UVC_GET_CUR, 0, intfnum,
>>>>>> + UVC_VC_REQUEST_ERROR_CODE_CONTROL, data, 1,
>>>>>> + UVC_CTRL_CONTROL_TIMEOUT);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - error = *(u8 *)data;
>>>>>> - *(u8 *)data = tmp;
>>>>>> + if (ret == 1)
>>>>>> + error = *(u8 *)data;
>>>>>> + *(u8 *)data = tmp;
>>>>>> + if (ret != 1)
>>>>>> + ret = ret < 0 ? ret : -EPIPE;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - if (ret != 1)
>>>>>> - return ret < 0 ? ret : -EPIPE;
>>>>>> + if (error)
>>>>>> + dev_dbg(&dev->udev->dev,
>>>>>> + "Failed to query (%s) UVC control %u on unit %u: got error %u.\n",
>>>>>> + uvc_query_name(query), cs, unit, error);
>>>>>> + else
>>>>>> + dev_err(&dev->udev->dev,
>>>>>> + "Failed to query (%s) UVC control %u on unit %u: %d (exp. %u).\n",
>>>>>> + uvc_query_name(query), cs, unit, ret, size);
>>>>>
>>>>> If __uvc_query_ctrl and UVC_VC_REQUEST_ERROR_CODE_CONTROL failed,
>>>>> error is 0. And I think that you want to show a dev_err in that case.
>>>>> Maybe we can initialize error to 7 ?
>>>>
>>>> I'm confused, if error == 0, then it does show dev_err.
>>>
>>> My bad.
>>>
>>> Ignore the message.
>>>
>>> Can we write it as ?:
>>>
>>> if (!error) {
>>> dev_dbg(&dev->udev->dev,
>>> "Failed to query (%s) UVC control %u on unit %u: got error %u.\n",
>>> uvc_query_name(query), cs, unit, error);
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> dev_err(&dev->udev->dev,
>>> "Failed to query (%s) UVC control %u on unit %u: %d (exp. %u).\n",
>>> uvc_query_name(query), cs, unit, ret, size);
>>
>> Sure! Just take this patch as inspiration :-)
>
> Do you mind if I modify it before resend?
No problem, feel free!
Hans
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - uvc_dbg(dev, CONTROL, "Control error %u\n", error);
>>>>>> + if (!error)
>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> I think we do not want these two lines (read next comment)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> switch (error) {
>>>>>> - case 0:
>>>>>> - /* Cannot happen - we received a STALL */
>>>>>> - return -EPIPE;
>>>>>> case 1: /* Not ready */
>>>>>> return -EBUSY;
>>>>>> case 2: /* Wrong state */
>>>>>> - return -EILSEQ;
>>>>>> + return -EACCES;
>>>>>> case 3: /* Power */
>>>>>> return -EREMOTE;
>>>>>> case 4: /* Out of range */
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we want a dev_dbg if the error code is unknown and return ret?
>>>>
>>>> Make sense.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
