On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 2:56 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:44 AM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:18 AM syzbot
> > <syzbot+142888ffec98ab194028@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > syzbot found the following issue on:
> > >
> > > HEAD commit: 29ad81a1 arch/x86: add missing include to sparsemem.h
>
> This tree seems to be missing fb18802a338b ("media: v4l: ioctl: Fix memory
> leak in video_usercopy"), which rewrote that function partly and might
> fix the problem.
>
> > > Local variable ----sbuf@video_usercopy created at:
> > > video_usercopy+0xaa/0x3d30 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3285
> > > video_usercopy+0xaa/0x3d30 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3285
> > > =====================================================
> > > =====================================================
> > > BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in check_fmt+0x864/0x1070 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:963
> > > CPU: 0 PID: 19595 Comm: syz-executor.4 Tainted: G B 5.11.0-rc7-syzkaller #0
> > > Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> > > Call Trace:
> > > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
> > > dump_stack+0x21c/0x280 lib/dump_stack.c:120
> > > kmsan_report+0xfb/0x1e0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_report.c:118
> > > __msan_warning+0x5f/0xa0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:197
> > > check_fmt+0x864/0x1070 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:963
> > > v4l_prepare_buf+0xbf/0x1d0 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:2107
> > > __video_do_ioctl+0x15cd/0x1d20 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:2993
> > > video_usercopy+0x2313/0x3d30 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3345
> > > video_ioctl2+0x9f/0xb0 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3391
> > > v4l2_ioctl+0x255/0x290 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c:360
> > > v4l2_compat_ioctl32+0x2c6/0x370 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c:1248
> > > __do_compat_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:842 [inline]
> > > __se_compat_sys_ioctl+0x53d/0x1100 fs/ioctl.c:793
> > > __ia32_compat_sys_ioctl+0x4a/0x70 fs/ioctl.c:793
> > > do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:79 [inline]
> > > __do_fast_syscall_32+0x102/0x160 arch/x86/entry/common.c:141
> > > do_fast_syscall_32+0x6a/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:166
> > > do_SYSENTER_32+0x73/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:209
> > > entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x4d/0x5c
> > > RIP: 0023:0xf7fec549
> > > Code: 03 74 c0 01 10 05 03 74 b8 01 10 06 03 74 b4 01 10 07 03 74 b0 01 10 08 03 74 d8 01 00 00 00 00 00 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90 90 90 90 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00
> > > RSP: 002b:00000000f55e65fc EFLAGS: 00000296 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
> > > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00000000c050565d
> > > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> > > RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> > > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> > > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> > >
> > > Local variable ----sbuf@video_usercopy created at:
> > > video_usercopy+0xaa/0x3d30 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3285
> > > video_usercopy+0xaa/0x3d30 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c:3285
> > > =====================================================
> >
> > I did not get to the very bottom of this, but I looked at this a bit.
> > It seems to be related to some unfortunate interaction of compat
> > syscall and CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME. It seems that in this case
> > nothing at all is copied from userspace because cmd gets messed up or
> > something. Perhaps VIDIOC_QUERYBUF is translated into
> > VIDIOC_QUERYBUF_TIME32 instead of VIDIOC_QUERYBUF32_TIME32 and then
> > this gets into compat syscall path and v4l2_compat_get_user does not
> > recognize the command, copies nothing but returns 0.
>
> User space would be calling VIDIOC_QUERYBUF32_TIME32 here,
> if it's built against glibc, though with a musl based user space, you
> would get called with VIDIOC_QUERYBUF32.
Or somebody fetching somebody else's credit card number will be
calling VIDIOC_QUERYBUF_TIME32 directly ;)
> What I notice in get_v4l2_buffer32_time32(), is that we do a full
> copy_from_user() to the stack of this function, and then copy the
> members individually to the output v4l2_buffer structure:
>
> struct v4l2_buffer32_time32 vb32;
> if (copy_from_user(&vb32, arg, sizeof(vb32)))
> return -EFAULT;
> *vb = (struct v4l2_buffer) {
> .index = vb32.index,
> .type = vb32.type,
> .bytesused = vb32.bytesused,
> .flags = vb32.flags,
> .field = vb32.field,
> .timestamp.tv_sec = vb32.timestamp.tv_sec,
> .timestamp.tv_usec = vb32.timestamp.tv_usec,
> .timecode = vb32.timecode,
> .sequence = vb32.sequence,
> .memory = vb32.memory,
> .m.offset = vb32.m.offset,
> .length = vb32.length,
> .request_fd = vb32.request_fd,
> };
>
> This struct assignment will however leave any padding
> fields uninitialized. There is padding between 'field' and
> 'timestamp. Could that trigger a KMSAN bug?
Report seems to be saying it's vb.type that's uninitialized. I suspect
we copy nothing at all from user space.
