On Saturday 01 May 2010 11:55:37 Hans Verkuil wrote: > However, I do think it would be better to > create a video_ioctl2_bkl rather than add a video_ioctl2_unlocked. The current > video_ioctl2 function is already unlocked. So you are subtle changing the > behavior of video_ioctl2. Not a good idea IMHO. And yes, grepping for > video_ioctl2_bkl is also easy to do and makes it more obvious that the BKL is > used in drivers that call this. Yes, that makes sense. It also allows working towards a goal of 'removing video_ioctl2_bkl', which is easier to understand than 'converting video_ioctl2 users to video_ioctl2_unlocked and later renaming that'. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
