On 1/28/21 9:09 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup() documentation mentions
> v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse_sensor_common, which was actually
> introduced as v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_sensor_common(),
> in commit 7a9ec808ad46 ("media: v4l: fwnode: Add convenience function for
> parsing common external refs").
>
> The function drivers do use is
> v4l2_async_register_subdev_sensor_common().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/media/v4l2-async.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-async.h b/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> index 8815e233677e..f2cac0931372 100644
> --- a/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-async.h
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier);
> * notifier after calling
> * @v4l2_async_notifier_add_subdev,
> * @v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints or
> - * @v4l2_fwnode_reference_parse_sensor_common.
> + * @v4l2_async_register_subdev_sensor_common.
This line gets removed on patch 14/14, maybe just drop this patch?
Thanks
Helen
> *
> * There is no harm from calling v4l2_async_notifier_cleanup in other
> * cases as long as its memory has been zeroed after it has been
>
