On 19/01/2021 18:47, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.01.21 um 17:32 schrieb Hans Verkuil:
>> On 19/01/2021 16:32, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 19.01.21 um 16:00 schrieb Hans Verkuil:
>>>> On 19/01/2021 15:53, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>>>>> Each entry in the array is a 20 bits value composed of 16
>>>>> bits unsigned integer and 4 bits fractional part. So the
>>>>> type should change to __u32.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This patch is applied on top of v6 of the patchset
>>>>> "Fix the rkisp1 userspace API for later IP versions"
>>>>>
>>>>> include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h | 5 +++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h b/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h
>>>>> index 57ca3eea985f..47f6b84d7c56 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rkisp1-config.h
>>>>> @@ -895,7 +895,8 @@ struct rkisp1_cif_isp_af_stat {
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * struct rkisp1_cif_isp_hist_stat - statistics histogram data
>>>>> *
>>>>> - * @hist_bins: measured bin counters
>>>>> + * @hist_bins: measured bin counters. Each bin is a 20 bits value
>>>>> + * composed of a 16-bit unsigned integer and 4 bits fractional part.
>>>>
>>>> So bits 0-3 are the fractional part and bits 4-19 contain the integer part?
>>>> What goes where should be defined!
>>>
>>> Actually I don't know, I just copied the docs in the datasheet.
>>> I can try figure it out. I can meanwhile send a patch without the doc until
>>> we are sure. Is that OK?
>>
>> No, this should be documented properly.
>
> I see that indeed bits 0-3 are the fractional part.
> The measurements are taken over 25 sub-windows and it is possible to
> give a weight to each window. If I set all weights to 1 then I expect to get
> an integer value and indeed in that case I see that the last 4 bits are always 0.
> If I set the weights to other than 1 I get the last 4 bits not only 0.
>
> The UAPI is generally not very good documented mainly because there is currently
> no open source userspace that uses it.
>
>>
>> Is this the only fractional type that is used in the rkisp1 uapi or are there
>> others? (Just checking).
>
> There are other places as well.
> I see that there are some values in rkisp1_cif_isp_lsc_config that are fractional
> and not documented.
> The two other fractional types in the uapi are already documented.
>
> I can add a patch that extends the documentation of all the fields in the uapi using the datasheet.
> But I think such a patch can be added after de-staging.
You need to make changes anyway in the uAPI for 5.11 (including fixing the
bad u8 cast), so let's do this right.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Thanks,
> Dafna
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Looking at rkisp1_stats_get_hst_meas() I see this:
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < RKISP1_CIF_ISP_HIST_BIN_N_MAX; i++)
>>>> pbuf->params.hist.hist_bins[i] =
>>>> (u8)rkisp1_read(rkisp1,
>>>> RKISP1_CIF_ISP_HIST_BIN_0 + i * 4);
>>>>
>>>> Here this is cast to a u8, so how does this work?
>>>
>>> This seems to be a bug. I see that this cast is introduced in v12 of the patch
>>> "media: staging: rkisp1: add capture device for statistics".
>>> This cast does not exist in any of the downstream versions.
>>
>> Clearly something that needs to be fixed as well.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dafna
>>>
>>>>
>>>> There is something fishy here...
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>>> *
>>>>> * The histogram values divided into 16 bins for V10/V11 and 32 bins
>>>>> * for V12/V13. It is configured within the struct rkisp1_cif_isp_hst_config.
>>>>> @@ -909,7 +910,7 @@ struct rkisp1_cif_isp_af_stat {
>>>>> * RKISP1_CIF_ISP_HIST_BIN_N_MAX is equal to the maximum of the two.
>>>>> */
>>>>> struct rkisp1_cif_isp_hist_stat {
>>>>> - __u16 hist_bins[RKISP1_CIF_ISP_HIST_BIN_N_MAX];
>>>>> + __u32 hist_bins[RKISP1_CIF_ISP_HIST_BIN_N_MAX];
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> /**
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
