On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 19:47 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Ezequiel, > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 02:42:32PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 17:27 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > imx6-media-objs contains a set of objects that are specific to the i.MX6 > > > IPU-based media subsystem. They're not needed for the i.MX7 CSI. Only > > > compile them if CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_CSI is selected. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/media/imx/Makefile | 8 ++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/imx/Makefile b/drivers/staging/media/imx/Makefile > > > index 9bd9e873ba7c..6ac33275cc97 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/imx/Makefile > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/imx/Makefile > > > @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ > > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > +imx-media-common-objs := imx-media-capture.o imx-media-dev-common.o \ > > > + imx-media-of.o imx-media-utils.o > > > + > > > imx6-media-objs := imx-media-dev.o imx-media-internal-sd.o \ > > > imx-ic-common.o imx-ic-prp.o imx-ic-prpencvf.o imx-media-vdic.o \ > > > imx-media-csc-scaler.o > > > > > > -imx-media-common-objs := imx-media-capture.o imx-media-dev-common.o \ > > > - imx-media-of.o imx-media-utils.o > > > - > > > imx6-media-csi-objs := imx-media-csi.o imx-media-fim.o > > > > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_MEDIA) += imx6-media.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_MEDIA) += imx-media-common.o > > > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_CSI) += imx6-media.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_CSI) += imx6-media-csi.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX_CSI) += imx6-mipi-csi2.o > > > > Nice change. This shows more clearly what's shared and what not. > > > > Would it be too hard to walk the extra kilometer (not necesarily now, > > not necesarily looking at you do it) split imx6 and imx7 better, > > so we can start thinking what's needed to destage imx6? > > I'd really welcome that, but I'd like to get this series merged first. > Unless you want a v2 with twice the number of patches ;-) > Well, maybe that'd make you set a new record :) Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Ezequiel