On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 12:28, Andrey Konovalov
<andrey.konovalov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 08.01.2021 13:46, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > Hi Robert and Tomasz,
> >
> > On 08.01.2021 12:49, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >> Hi Robert,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 11:21 PM Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The Bayer GRBG10 mode used for earlier modes 3280x2460 and
> >>> 1640x1232 isn't the mode output by the sensor for the
> >>> 3264x2448 and 1632x1224 modes.
> >>>
> >>> Switch from MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10 to MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10
> >>> for 3264x2448 & 1632x1224 modes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v1:
> >>> - Sakari: Added mode information to ov8856_mode struct
> >>> - Sakari: enum_mbus_code updated
> >>>
> >>> drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> >>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c
> >>> index 2f4ceaa80593..7cd83564585c 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c
> >>> @@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ struct ov8856_mode {
> >>>
> >>> /* Sensor register settings for this resolution */
> >>> const struct ov8856_reg_list reg_list;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* MEDIA_BUS_FMT for this mode */
> >>> + u32 code;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> static const struct ov8856_reg mipi_data_rate_720mbps[] = {
> >>> @@ -942,6 +945,11 @@ static const char * const ov8856_test_pattern_menu[] = {
> >>> "Bottom-Top Darker Color Bar"
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +static const u32 ov8856_formats[] = {
> >>> + MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10,
> >>> + MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> static const s64 link_freq_menu_items[] = {
> >>> OV8856_LINK_FREQ_360MHZ,
> >>> OV8856_LINK_FREQ_180MHZ
> >>> @@ -974,6 +982,7 @@ static const struct ov8856_mode supported_modes[] = {
> >>> .regs = mode_3280x2464_regs,
> >>> },
> >>> .link_freq_index = OV8856_LINK_FREQ_720MBPS,
> >>> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10,
> >>> },
> >>> {
> >>> .width = 3264,
> >>> @@ -986,6 +995,7 @@ static const struct ov8856_mode supported_modes[] = {
> >>> .regs = mode_3264x2448_regs,
> >>> },
> >>> .link_freq_index = OV8856_LINK_FREQ_720MBPS,
> >>> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10,
> >>> },
> >>> {
> >>> .width = 1640,
> >>> @@ -998,6 +1008,7 @@ static const struct ov8856_mode supported_modes[] = {
> >>> .regs = mode_1640x1232_regs,
> >>> },
> >>> .link_freq_index = OV8856_LINK_FREQ_360MBPS,
> >>> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10,
> >>> },
> >>> {
> >>> .width = 1632,
> >>> @@ -1010,6 +1021,7 @@ static const struct ov8856_mode supported_modes[] = {
> >>> .regs = mode_1632x1224_regs,
> >>> },
> >>> .link_freq_index = OV8856_LINK_FREQ_360MBPS,
> >>> + .code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10,
> >>> }
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1281,8 +1293,8 @@ static void ov8856_update_pad_format(const struct ov8856_mode *mode,
> >>> {
> >>> fmt->width = mode->width;
> >>> fmt->height = mode->height;
> >>> - fmt->code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10;
> >>> fmt->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> >>> + fmt->code = mode->code;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static int ov8856_start_streaming(struct ov8856 *ov8856)
> >>> @@ -1519,11 +1531,10 @@ static int ov8856_enum_mbus_code(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>> struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> >>> struct v4l2_subdev_mbus_code_enum *code)
> >>> {
> >>> - /* Only one bayer order GRBG is supported */
> >>> - if (code->index > 0)
> >>> + if (code->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(ov8856_formats))
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>>
> >>> - code->code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10;
> >>> + code->code = ov8856_formats[code->index];
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -1532,10 +1543,11 @@ static int ov8856_enum_frame_size(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>> struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> >>> struct v4l2_subdev_frame_size_enum *fse)
> >>> {
> >>> - if (fse->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes))
> >>> + if ((fse->code != ov8856_formats[0]) &&
> >>> + (fse->code != ov8856_formats[1]))
> >>
> >> Shouldn't this be validated against the current mode? I guess it's the
> >> question about which part of the state takes precedence - the mbus
> >> code or the frame size.
> >
> > The docs [1] say "enumerate all frame sizes supported by a sub-device on the given pad
> > for the given media bus format". It doesn't seem to mention the current mode. But the
> > frame sizes reported should be filtered by the mbus code, and this patch misses that
> > if I read it correct.
> >
> > But this situation when the mbus code depends on the mode (on the resolution in fact)...
> > Yes, if we read the pixels from a rectangle smaller than the active area, we can change
> > the bayer order by moving this "read-out" rectangle by one pixel along x, y, or both x
> > and y axes. But wouldn't it be better if we try to review the register setting for the
> > current modes so that the bayer order would be the same for all the modes?
>
> This untested change should make the 3264x2448 and 1632x1224 modes to use
> the GRBG bayer order (I would prefer BGGR as this is the "native" order of the pixel
> array, but GRBG appeared in the driver first):
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c
> index d8cefd3d4045..b337f729d5e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c
> @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static const struct ov8856_reg mode_3264x2448_regs[] = {
> {0x3810, 0x00},
> {0x3811, 0x04},
> {0x3812, 0x00},
> - {0x3813, 0x02},
> + {0x3813, 0x01},
> {0x3814, 0x01},
> {0x3815, 0x01},
> {0x3816, 0x00},
> @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static const struct ov8856_reg mode_1632x1224_regs[] = {
> {0x3810, 0x00},
> {0x3811, 0x02},
> {0x3812, 0x00},
> - {0x3813, 0x02},
> + {0x3813, 0x01},
> {0x3814, 0x03},
> {0x3815, 0x01},
> {0x3816, 0x00},
>
>
This seems like the most elegant solution possible, thanks for suggesting it.
I'll verify that it works as expected on the db845c.
