Re: [PATCH] media: atomisp: ov2722: replace hardcoded function name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 06-Jan-21 09:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:29:18PM +0200, Filip Kolev wrote:
There is a debug message using hardcoded function name instead of the
__func__ macro. Replace it.

Report from checkpatch.pl on the file:

WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'ov2722_remove', this function's name, in a string
+	dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2722_remove...\n");

Signed-off-by: Filip Kolev <fil.kolev@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c
index eecefcd734d0e..21d6bc62d452a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/i2c/atomisp-ov2722.c
@@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ static int ov2722_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
  	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
  	struct ov2722_device *dev = to_ov2722_sensor(sd);
- dev_dbg(&client->dev, "ov2722_remove...\n");
+	dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s...\n", __func__);

dev_dbg() provides the function name already, and this is just a "trace"
call, and ftrace should be used instead, so the whole line should be
removed entirely.

Thank you for the review!

How do I go about this? Do I amend the patch and re-send as v2 or create a new patch entirely? Newbie here, doing this as part of the Eudyptula challenge, so I very much appreciate everyone's patience.


thanks,

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux