Hi Paul, On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:38:47AM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > On Mon 04 Jan 21, 14:07, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 03:27:01PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > > The OV8865 is a 8 Mpx CMOS image sensor producing 3264x2448 at 30 fps. > > > Other modes (including some with sub-sampling) are available too. > > > It outputs 10-bit bayer CFA data through a MIPI CSI-2 interface with > > > up to 4 lanes supported. > > > > I've added the patches to a pull request to Mauro; there appear to still be > > some checkpatch.pl issues in both of the drivers. > > > > I don't mind the warnings on the assignment or the mutex though. Could you > > address these in additional patches, please? > > Sorry about that, I realized that I never run checkpatch with --strict > so I completely missed those. > > I'll fix the cosmetic issues in a following patch. > > Just to clarify one thing: > #define OV8865_PAD_PK_DRIVE_STRENGTH_2X (1 << 5) > #define OV8865_BLC_CTRL1_COL_SHIFT_128 (1 << 4) > > these are not single-bit fields so even though it looks like they should > use BIT(), this would be incoherent with other possible values, such as: > #define OV8865_PAD_PK_DRIVE_STRENGTH_3X (2 << 5) > #define OV8865_BLC_CTRL1_COL_SHIFT_64 (2 << 4) Agreed. You might not assign the top bit, but if you did, the left operand would have to be unsigned to guarantee the intended result (otherwise it's undefined). -- Sakari Ailus
