Hi Sakari On 02/01/2021 17:07, Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:37:38PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: >>>>> +#define CIO2_NUM_PORTS 4 >>> This is already defined in ipu3-cio2.h. Could you include that instead? >> Yes; but I'd need to also include media/v4l2-device.h and >> media/videobuf2-dma-sg.h (they're included in ipu3-cio2-main.c at the >> moment). It didn't seem worth it; but I can move those two includes from >> the .c to the .h and then include ipu3-cio2.h in cio2-bridge.h >> >> Which do you prefer? > Seems you got answers already... :-) splitting the header in two seems good > to me. But IMO it doesn't have to be a part of this set. > Yeah I've been hesitating over this; if we chose not to do it in this set though, how would you want me to deal with the double definition of CIO2_NUM_PORTS
