On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:50:27PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:41:02PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > > > Ah! maximum: 8. I was about to reply to Rob's video-interfaces > > > conversion and this might need to be pointed out. > > > I was also about to ask it it's an issue if the bindings validation > > > does not catch arrays as: [1, 3] as the constraint of being > > > monotonically increasing values is expressed in words only. I guess > > > it's fine, the alternative syntax is awful: > > > > > > anyOf: > > > - items: > > > - const: 1 > > > - const: 2 > > > - items: > > > - const: 1 > > > - const: 2 > > > - const: 3 > > > - const: 4 > > > > The v4l2-fwnode framework doesn't do that, what it does check for, though, > > I meant the dt-validation :) I think it'd be very nice to have that check there, too. :-) -- Sakari Ailus
