On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 09:12:25AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:41:29PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > I feel like this is ready for some wider soaking. Since the remaining bits > > are all kinda connnected probably simplest if it all goes through -mm. > > Did you figure out a sumbission plan for this stuff? I was kinda hoping Andrew would pick it all up. > > Daniel Vetter (17): > > drm/exynos: Stop using frame_vector helpers > > drm/exynos: Use FOLL_LONGTERM for g2d cmdlists > > misc/habana: Stop using frame_vector helpers > > misc/habana: Use FOLL_LONGTERM for userptr > > mm/frame-vector: Use FOLL_LONGTERM > > media: videobuf2: Move frame_vector into media subsystem > > At the very least it would be good to get those in right away. > > > mm: Add unsafe_follow_pfn > > media/videbuf1|2: Mark follow_pfn usage as unsafe > > vfio/type1: Mark follow_pfn as unsafe > > I'm surprised nobody from VFIO has remarked on this, I think thety > won't like it Same here tbh :-) > > mm: Close race in generic_access_phys > > PCI: Obey iomem restrictions for procfs mmap > > /dev/mem: Only set filp->f_mapping > > resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework > > sysfs: Support zapping of binary attr mmaps > > PCI: Revoke mappings like devmem > > This sequence seems fairly stand alone, and in good shape as well Yeah your split makes sense. I'll reorder them for the next round (which I'm prepping right now). > > My advice is to put the done things on a branch and get Stephen to put > them in linux-next. You can send a PR to Lins. There is very little mm > stuff in here, and cross subsystem stuff works better in git land, > IMHO. Yeah could do. Andrew, any preferences? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
