Hi Christoph On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:25 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 03:53:55PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: > > Hi Christoph > > > > I have started now to give a try to your patchset. Sorry for the delay. > > > > For uvc I have prepared this patch: > > https://github.com/ribalda/linux/commit/9094fe223fe38f8c8ff21366d893b43cbbdf0113 > > > > I have tested successfully in a x86_64 noteboot..., yes I know there > > is no change for that platform :). > > I am trying to get hold of an arm device that can run the latest > > kernel from upstream. > > > > On the meanwhile if you could take a look to the patch to verify that > > this the way that you expect the drivers to use your api I would > > appreciate it > > This looks pretty reaosnable. > Great Also FYI, I managed to boot an ARM device with that tree. But I could not test the uvc driver (it was a remote device with no usb device attached) Hopefully I will be able to test it for real this week. Any suggestions for how to measure performance difference? Thanks! > Note that ifdef CONFIG_DMA_NONCOHERENT in the old code doesn't actually > work, as that option is an internal thing just for mips and sh.. -- Ricardo Ribalda
