On 22/10/2020 14:40, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:59 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 20/10/2020 10:41, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> ...
>
>>>> +static const char * const port_names[] = {
>>>> + "port0", "port1", "port2", "port3"
>>> + comma.
>> I think 4 ports is the maximum for CIO2 device, so this shouldn't ever
>> get extended?
> It's better for at least teaching purposes (if anybody takes this
> driver as an example for anything) if you have really believe that no
> new generation will have more than that.
Yeah fair point - it's added
>>>> + if (is_software_node(dev_fwnode(&pci_dev->dev)))
>>> Can we use the same check as for _build call above?
>> And just set a flag in struct cio2? sure.
> I meant can we use exact conditional w/o any additional flags added?
Oh I see. Erm...I can't think of a way to do that immediately; checking
for the fwnode graph's presence will of course pass if it's defined in
ACPI too. Let me think about it
