On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 10:56:04PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Yes. And make sure the API isn't implemented when VIVT caches are > > used, but that isn't really different from the current interface. > > Okay, thanks. Let's see if we can make necessary changes to the videobuf2. > > +Sergey Senozhatsky for awareness too. I can defer the changes a bit to see if you'd really much prefer the former interface. I think for now the most important thing is that it works properly for the potential users, and the prime one is videobuf2 for now. drm also seems like a big potential users, but I had a really hard time getting the developers to engage in API development.
