> I think we might be overly complicating things. IMHO the series as is > with the "i2c_" prefix removed from the flags introduced would be > reusable as is for any other subsystem that needs it. Of course, for > now, the handling of the flag would remain implemented only in the I2C > subsystem. Just to be clear: you are suggesting to remove "i2c" from the DSD binding "i2c-allow-low-power-probe". And you are not talking about moving I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE to struct device_driver? I recall the latter has been NACKed by gkh so far.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
