On 10/09/2020 12:14, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (20/09/10 11:57), Hans Verkuil wrote: >> >> Perhaps, but this patch is meant to revert *all* changes relating to >> V4L2_FLAG_MEMORY_NON_CONSISTENT. We don't want to have unused fields >> in the public API. > > OK, would you prefer a squashed patch for all the kernel rollbacks and > cleanups or a patch series? My preference is a single patch. Regards, Hans