On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 3:08 PM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03/08/2020 21:21, Niklas wrote: > > Hi Lad, Hans, > > > > On 2020-08-03 19:11:32 +0100, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > >> Hi Hans, > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 10:04 AM Niklas <niklas.soderlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Lad, > >>> > >>> Thanks for your work. > >>> > >>> On 2020-07-31 10:29:05 +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote: > >>>> The crop and compose settings for VIN in non mc mode werent updated > >>>> in s_fmt call this resulted in captured images being clipped. > >>>> > >>>> With the below sequence on the third capture where size is set to > >>>> 640x480 resulted in clipped image of size 320x240. > >>>> > >>>> high(640x480) -> low (320x240) -> high (640x480) > >>>> > >>>> This patch makes sure the VIN crop and compose settings are updated. > >>> > >>> This is clearly an inconsistency in the VIN driver that should be fixed. > >>> But I think the none-mc mode implements the correct behavior. That is > >>> that S_FMT should not modify the crop/compose rectangles other then make > >>> sure they don't go out of bounds. This is an area we tried to clarify in > >>> the past but I'm still not sure what the correct answer to. > >>> > >> What should be the exact behaviour of the bridge driver for s_fmt > >> call. Should the crop/compose settings be updated for every s_fmt > >> callback or should they be only updated on s_selection callback. > >> Currently the non-mc rcar-vin doesnt update the crop/compose setting > >> in s_fmt callback due to which I see the above issue as mentioned. > > > > This is not entirely correct. It does update the crop and compose > > rectangles on s_fmt, it makes sure they are not out-of-bounds for the > > new format if it's accepted by s_fmt. See v4l2_rect_map_inside() calls > > in the snippet bellow. > > For non-mc mode s_fmt must update any crop/compose rectangles to ensure that > they are not out-of-bounds. But for mc mode the validation is done when you > start streaming, so I think s_fmt won't make any changes in that mode. > Thank you Hans. > Double-check that with Laurent, though... > Niklas/Laurent - How do we proceed on this ? Cheers, Prabhakar