On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:12 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:50:08PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 10:31:28AM +0900, David Stevens wrote: > > > Unless there are any remaining objections to these patches, what are > > > the next steps towards getting these merged? Sorry, I'm not familiar > > > with the workflow for contributing patches to Linux. > > > > Sorry, just have been busy and not paying as much attention to drm > > patches as usual. Playing catch-up now. Queued for drm-misc-next, > > unless something goes wrong in my testing the patches should land > > in linux-next soon and be merged upstream in the next merge window. > > Oh, spoke too soon. scripts/checkpatch.pl has a bunch of codestyle > warnings. Can you fix them and resend? Sent a new version to fix the line length warning. There's still a MAINTAINER warning, but I think the new virtio_dma_buf file can fall under virtio core (and the existing wildcards do match it), rather than get its own MAINTAINER entry. I can break it out into its own thing if that's better, though. -David
