On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at 06:06, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 6:40 AM Ezequiel Garcia
> <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 03:09, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Add support for communicating with the SCP firmware, which will be used
> > > by MT8183.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > [acourbot: refactor, cleanup and split]
> > > Co-developed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/platform/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c | 3 +
> > > .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c | 3 +
> > > .../media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_fw.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > .../media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_fw.h | 2 +
> > > 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/Kconfig b/drivers/media/platform/Kconfig
> > > index c57ee78fa99d..f0dbe048efea 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/Kconfig
> > > @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ config VIDEO_MEDIATEK_VCODEC
> > > select VIDEOBUF2_DMA_CONTIG
> > > select V4L2_MEM2MEM_DEV
> > > select VIDEO_MEDIATEK_VPU
> > > + select MTK_SCP
> > > help
> > > Mediatek video codec driver provides HW capability to
> > > encode and decode in a range of video formats
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c
> > > index 4f07a5fcce7f..5b5765b98e57 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_dec_drv.c
> > > @@ -225,6 +225,9 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "mediatek,vpu",
> > > &rproc_phandle)) {
> > > fw_type = VPU;
> > > + } else if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "mediatek,scp",
> > > + &rproc_phandle)) {
> > > + fw_type = SCP;
> > > } else {
> > > mtk_v4l2_err("Could not get vdec IPI device");
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c
> > > index 4340ea10afd0..42530cd01a30 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c
> > > @@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "mediatek,vpu",
> > > &rproc_phandle)) {
> > > fw_type = VPU;
> > > + } else if (!of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "mediatek,scp",
> > > + &rproc_phandle)) {
> > > + fw_type = SCP;
> > > } else {
> > > mtk_v4l2_err("Could not get venc IPI device");
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_fw.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_fw.c
> > > index 967bb100a990..f2a62ea62fc6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_fw.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_fw.c
> > > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_fw {
> > > enum mtk_vcodec_fw_type type;
> > > const struct mtk_vcodec_fw_ops *ops;
> > > struct platform_device *pdev;
> > > + struct mtk_scp *scp;
> > > };
> > >
> > > static int mtk_vcodec_vpu_load_firmware(struct mtk_vcodec_fw *fw)
> > > @@ -71,6 +72,48 @@ static const struct mtk_vcodec_fw_ops mtk_vcodec_vpu_msg = {
> > > .ipi_send = mtk_vcodec_vpu_ipi_send,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static int mtk_vcodec_scp_load_firmware(struct mtk_vcodec_fw *fw)
> > > +{
> > > + return rproc_boot(scp_get_rproc(fw->scp));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static unsigned int mtk_vcodec_scp_get_vdec_capa(struct mtk_vcodec_fw *fw)
> > > +{
> > > + return scp_get_vdec_hw_capa(fw->scp);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static unsigned int mtk_vcodec_scp_get_venc_capa(struct mtk_vcodec_fw *fw)
> > > +{
> > > + return scp_get_venc_hw_capa(fw->scp);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void *mtk_vcodec_vpu_scp_dm_addr(struct mtk_vcodec_fw *fw,
> > > + u32 dtcm_dmem_addr)
> > > +{
> > > + return scp_mapping_dm_addr(fw->scp, dtcm_dmem_addr);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int mtk_vcodec_scp_set_ipi_register(struct mtk_vcodec_fw *fw, int id,
> > > + mtk_vcodec_ipi_handler handler, const char *name, void *priv)
> > > +{
> > > + return scp_ipi_register(fw->scp, id, handler, priv);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int mtk_vcodec_scp_ipi_send(struct mtk_vcodec_fw *fw, int id, void *buf,
> > > + unsigned int len, unsigned int wait)
> > > +{
> > > + return scp_ipi_send(fw->scp, id, buf, len, wait);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const struct mtk_vcodec_fw_ops mtk_vcodec_rproc_msg = {
> > > + .load_firmware = mtk_vcodec_scp_load_firmware,
> > > + .get_vdec_capa = mtk_vcodec_scp_get_vdec_capa,
> > > + .get_venc_capa = mtk_vcodec_scp_get_venc_capa,
> > > + .map_dm_addr = mtk_vcodec_vpu_scp_dm_addr,
> > > + .ipi_register = mtk_vcodec_scp_set_ipi_register,
> > > + .ipi_send = mtk_vcodec_scp_ipi_send,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static void mtk_vcodec_reset_handler(void *priv)
> > > {
> > > struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev = priv;
> > > @@ -94,6 +137,7 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_fw *mtk_vcodec_fw_select(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev,
> > > const struct mtk_vcodec_fw_ops *ops;
> > > struct mtk_vcodec_fw *fw;
> > > struct platform_device *fw_pdev = NULL;
> > > + struct mtk_scp *scp = NULL;
> > >
> > > switch (type) {
> > > case VPU:
> > > @@ -106,6 +150,14 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_fw *mtk_vcodec_fw_select(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev,
> > > vpu_wdt_reg_handler(fw_pdev, mtk_vcodec_reset_handler,
> > > dev, rst_id);
> > > break;
> > > + case SCP:
> > > + ops = &mtk_vcodec_rproc_msg;
> > > + scp = scp_get(dev->plat_dev);
> > > + if (!scp) {
> > > + mtk_v4l2_err("could not get vdec scp handle");
> > > + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> >
> > I suspect the EPROBE_DEFER should be returned by scp_get
> > itself instead.
>
> scp_get() is a function of of mtk_scp remoteproc driver, so even if we
> decide this is desirable (which I am not convinced, as the current
> code leaves the freedom to decide how the absence of SCP should be
> interpreted to the driver) this is beyond the scope of this series.
>
How can the consumer decide if it should defer probing or not?
> >
> > > + }
> > > + break;
> > > default:
> > > mtk_v4l2_err("invalid vcodec fw type");
> > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > @@ -118,6 +170,7 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_fw *mtk_vcodec_fw_select(struct mtk_vcodec_dev *dev,
> > > fw->type = type;
> > > fw->ops = ops;
> > > fw->pdev = fw_pdev;
> > > + fw->scp = scp;
> > >
> > > return fw;
> > > }
> > > @@ -129,6 +182,9 @@ void mtk_vcodec_fw_release(struct mtk_vcodec_fw *fw)
> > > case VPU:
> > > put_device(&fw->pdev->dev);
> > > break;
> > > + case SCP:
> > > + scp_put(fw->scp);
> >
> > Interestingly scp_put is a wrapper around put_device :-)
> > Perhaps not a reason to violate the layering.
>
> I don't see what is wrong with the current code? If SCP is in use, we
> use SCP functions to manage it. If in the future SCP involves in such
> a way that we need to do more than a put_device(), we are covered. Or
> am I missing something?
Oh, nothing wrong. I just found it interesting that scp_put was
just wrapping put_device. Nothing to fix really.
Thanks!
Ezequiel
