Hi Jacopo,
On Friday, July 17, 2020 9:20:18 A.M. CEST Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Hi Janusz,
> thanks for review
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:15:27AM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > Hi Jacopo,
> >
> > On Thursday, July 16, 2020 4:27:04 P.M. CEST Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > > Introduce two new pad operations to allow retrieving and configuring the
> > > media bus parameters on a subdevice pad.
> > >
> > > The newly introduced operations aims to replace the s/g_mbus_config video
> > > operations, which have been on their way for deprecation since a long
> > > time.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > include/media/v4l2-subdev.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
> > > index f7fe78a6f65a..d8b9d5735307 100644
> > > --- a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
> > > +++ b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
> > > @@ -670,6 +670,29 @@ struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config {
> > > *
> > > * @set_frame_desc: set the low level media bus frame parameters, @fd array
> > > * may be adjusted by the subdev driver to device capabilities.
> > > + *
> > > + * @get_mbus_config: get the media bus configuration of a remote sub-device.
> > > + * The media bus configuration is usually retrieved from the
> > > + * firmware interface at sub-device probe time, immediately
> > > + * applied to the hardware and eventually adjusted by the
> > > + * driver. Remote sub-devices (usually video receivers) shall
> > > + * use this operation to query the transmitting end bus
> > > + * configuration in order to adjust their own one accordingly.
> > > + * Callers should make sure they get the most up-to-date as
> > > + * possible configuration from the remote end, likely calling
> > > + * this operation as close as possible to stream on time. The
> > > + * operation shall fail if the pad index it has been called on
> > > + * is not valid.
> > > + *
> > > + * @set_mbus_config: set the media bus configuration of a remote sub-device.
> > > + * This operations is intended to allow, in combination with
> > > + * the get_mbus_config operation, the negotiation of media bus
> > > + * configuration parameters between media sub-devices. The
> > > + * operation shall not fail if the requested configuration is
> > > + * not supported, but the driver shall update the content of
> > > + * the %config argument to reflect what has been actually
> > > + * applied to the hardware. The operation shall fail if the
> > > + * pad index it has been called on is not valid.
>
> First of all, Hans sent a pull request for this series yesterday. Are
> you ok with that and with sending patches on top, or do you think the
> inclusion of the series should be post-poned ? (you can imagine what
> my preference is :)
>
> >
> > Could this description also clarify what results are expected in case of
> > hardware errors? The ov6650 implementation you propose may suggest such
> > errors may be expected to be ignored silently as long as current configuration
> > can be successfully obtained from hardware and passed back to the caller.
>
> I guess "it depends"(tm)
> I know this doesn't sound like a good answer :)
>
> A failure in applying or reading register likely means the driver is
> trying to access the hardware while it is in low power state. In this
> case I would consider this a driver bug, as it should try to be smart
> and cache settings and apply them at the proper time and return the
> current configuration, which should be cached as well.
>
> Of course things could go wrong for several reasons, and in the case
> if any unexpected error occurs I think an error is expected to be
> reported. Please note that this v7 of ov6650 does that by returning
> the return value of ov6650_get_mbus_config() at the end of
> ov6650_set_mbus_config.
Current configuration is not cached in your implementation proposed for ov6650.
If it was, would ov6650_set_mbus_config() always succeed, just passing it back
updated with successful writes and ignoring write errors? In other words,
is this the expected behavior of .set_mbus_config() to always treat
unsuccessful writes as recoverable errors and never report them to the caller
as long as there is a current configuration available that can passed back?
Thanks,
Janusz
>
> I guess this is pretty regular behaviour, although I missed it in the
> previous version, so it might be worth adding an additional line to
> the documentation.
>
> >
> > Moreover, since validity of the pad argument is expected to be verified, I
> > think this should be handled by the media infrastructure layer with the
> > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c:check_pad() helper called from a
> > .set_mbus_config() wrapper added to v4l2_subdev_call_pad_wrappers, freeing
> > drivers from reimplementing it.
> >
>
> Good point, and indeed my bad as I thought v4l2_subdev_call() would
> already do that by default, but looking at the actual implementation a
> wrapper might be a good idea indeed.
>
> Patches on top ?
>
> Thanks
> j
>
> > Thanks,
> > Janusz
> >
> > > */
> > > struct v4l2_subdev_pad_ops {
> > > int (*init_cfg)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > @@ -710,6 +733,10 @@ struct v4l2_subdev_pad_ops {
> > > struct v4l2_mbus_frame_desc *fd);
> > > int (*set_frame_desc)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, unsigned int pad,
> > > struct v4l2_mbus_frame_desc *fd);
> > > + int (*get_mbus_config)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, unsigned int pad,
> > > + struct v4l2_mbus_config *config);
> > > + int (*set_mbus_config)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, unsigned int pad,
> > > + struct v4l2_mbus_config *config);
> > > };
> > >
> > > /**
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
