Hi Sylwester and Tomasz,
On 2020-07-08 8:34 a.m., Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07.07.2020 20:09, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 07:26:43PM -0700, Jonathan Bakker wrote:
>>> Commit bae4500399c4 ("[media] exynos4-is: Add missing entity function
>>> initialization") tried to suppress the warnings such as
>>>
>>> s5p-fimc-md camera: Entity type for entity FIMC.0 was not initialized!
>>>
>>> However, this didn't work in all cases. Correct this by calling the set
>>> function earlier.
>>>
>>> Fixes: bae4500399c4 ("exynos4-is: Add missing entity function initialization")
>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-capture.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>> Thank you for the patch. Please see my comments inline.
>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-capture.c
>>> index 705f182330ca..86c233e2f2c9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-capture.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-capture.c
>>> @@ -1799,7 +1799,6 @@ static int fimc_register_capture_device(struct fimc_dev *fimc,
>>> vid_cap->wb_fmt.code = fmt->mbus_code;
>>>
>>> vid_cap->vd_pad.flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SINK;
>>> - vfd->entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_PROC_VIDEO_SCALER;
>
> I think we should leave above line as is, or perhaps change the function
> to MEDIA_ENT_F_PROC_VIDEO_COMPOSER and...
>
>> Isn't vfd->entity above a different entity than sd->entity below? If so,
>> this line must stay.
>>
>>> ret = media_entity_pads_init(&vfd->entity, 1, &vid_cap->vd_pad);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto err_free_ctx;
>>> @@ -1898,6 +1897,7 @@ int fimc_initialize_capture_subdev(struct fimc_dev *fimc)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> sd->entity.ops = &fimc_sd_media_ops;
>>> + sd->entity.function = MEDIA_ENT_F_PROC_VIDEO_SCALER;
>
> ...also add an assignment like this.
>
> vfd->entity and sd->entity are different entities, vfd->entity corresponds to
> the capture video node and sd->entity is the capture subdevice media entity.
>
Whoops, I totally misinterpreted the fact that they are different entities. For v2
I'll remove the removal from vfd and just add MEDIA_ENT_F_PROC_VIDEO_SCALER to the sd
entity.
>> My understanding is that this is the capture subdev and not the scaler.
>> Looking at the other drivers, MEDIA_ENT_F_PROC_VIDEO_PIXEL_FORMATTER
>> could be the right function to use here.
>
> Scaling can also be configured on that subdev, actually both functions would
> be valid.
>
Thanks,
Jonathan
