On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 08:43:30PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:03 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:05:44AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 01:03:39PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > > > The dmabuf heaps have been in an official kernel now for all of three > > > > weeks. So yea, we can "delete [ION] and see who even notices", but I > > > > worry that may seem a bit like contempt for the folks doing the work > > > > on transitioning over, which doesn't help getting them to participate > > > > within the community. > > > > > > But they aren't participating in the community today as no one is > > > touching the ion code. So I fail to see how keeping a dead-end-version > > > of ion in the kernel tree really affects anyone these days. > > > > So, any thoughts here? What's the timeline for ion being able to be > > removed that you are comfortable with? > > Sorry for the slow reply. So my earlier plan was to drop it after the next LTS? Ok, fair enough, we can wait until January. thanks, greg k-h
